If the two basic premises underpinning much of modern human life are fundamentally flawed, what could replace them?
If the two basic premises underpinning much of modern human life are fundamentally flawed, what could replace them?
If the two basic premises underpinning much of modern human life (social contract theory and the individualistic theories) are fundamentally flawed, what could replace them? Because both engage with the ‘should’ rather than the ‘is’, they are prescriptive rather than descriptive, and thus the answer to this question is beyond the scope of this philosophy. New political theories need to be devised to provide us with alternatives for the roles of the state and humans, as well as all other Beings, in both the analogue and the digital worlds.
Navigate: ← §26.00.10.00 · Corpus