How is this definition best visualised?

How is this definition best visualised? In essence, whenever any two individuals communicate, a third, silent interlocutor is implied. This is the state, which warrants their communication. The state warrants that, for example, John is John and Maria is Maria, so as for John and Maria to be able to communicate. Unless this assumption is made, there is no way for these two individuals (unless they are within the same family and therefore already know each other) to be certain that the other party is actually who he or she claims to be. It is the silent, omnipresent (but not omnipotent, see §16.00.02 and §16.00.03, as well as §12.00.10) third party, the state, that warrants this, and thus makes any human contact, and meaningful human life (as in the human life we all know and, hopefully, appreciate – hence, ‘meaningful’ (see also §08.00.01 and §08.00.08), and not, for example, the life of an animal, an organisation or an artificial Being, see also §01.00.09, and §02.00.06 and §02.00.12), possible.

Navigate: ← §07.00.02.00 · Corpus · §07.00.04.00 →