Skip to content

Corpus

00 — Bibliographical information

00.00 — §00.00.00

00.01 — Foreword

00.02 — Prologue

01 — Information

01.00 — §01.00.00

01.01 — Material and immaterial information

02 — Beings

02.00 — §02.00.00

02.01 — Humans

  • §02.01.00.00 — Humans
  • §02.01.01.00 — Humans are Beings
  • §02.01.02.00 — States turn humans into individuals, and make possible the augmentation of information processing by them
  • §02.01.03.00 — Humans use Reason in their information processing in the same way as animals
  • §02.01.04.00 — Humans differ from each other
  • §02.01.05.00 — Are non-biological Beings different to each other?

03 — Things

03.00 — §03.00.00

  • §03.00.00.00 — Things
  • §03.00.01.00 — Every thing (all that is found in the analogue and the digital worlds that is not a Being) is a dataset
  • §03.00.02.00 — Things, unlike Beings, cannot process information
  • §03.00.03.00 — Things are either found in Nature or are created by Beings (artefacts)
  • §03.00.04.00 — Artefacts
  • §03.00.05.00 — Things (and Beings, in this regard) are to be treated as a single, unitary dataset

04 — Processing

04.00 — §04.00.00

  • §04.00.00.00 — Processing
  • §04.00.01.00 — Processing is any and every treatment of and interaction with information
  • §04.00.01.01
  • §04.00.02.00 — The processing of information leads to the creation of new information
  • §04.00.03.00 — Processing is a collective term
  • §04.00.04.00 — Processing is material
  • §04.00.05.00 — The consequences of the materiality of the processing
  • §04.00.06.00 — A beginning but not necessarily an end
  • §04.00.07.00 — Co-processing is possible, but not all processing is equal
  • §04.00.08.00 — There is no Being or Thing that is outside the control of a single, identifiable Being
  • §04.00.09.00 — How a Being came to be able to exercise control over a dataset is beyond the scope of this analysis
  • §04.00.09.01
  • §04.00.10.00 — The state makes possible the control and rights to process information
  • §04.00.11.00 — Neither humans nor states are aggressive by nature
  • §04.00.12.00 — The processing of information by humans is made possible only on the information platform that is their state
  • §04.00.13.00 — The processing of information is not a given nor is it static
  • §04.00.14.00 — Use of information

04.01 — Reason

05 — Need and opportunity

05.00 — §05.00.00

05.01 — A need specific to humans

06 — Control

06.00 — §06.00.00

07 — State definition - States are information platforms for their citizens

07.00 — §07.00.00

07.01 — Information platforms

08 — States are natural to humans

08.00 — §08.00.00

08.01 — Names

09 — State formation – from word of mouth to the modern state

09.00 — §09.00.00

  • §09.00.00.00 — State formation – from word of mouth to the modern state
  • §09.00.01.00 — States taking shape in the analogue world
  • §09.00.02.00 — States were not artificially created by humans
  • §09.00.03.00 — Writing made it possible for the state to take the form known to us in the analogue world
  • §09.00.04.00 — State formation not to be confused with the creation of the information processing environment
  • §09.00.05.00 — The transactional and territorial state
  • §09.00.06.00 — Both of the above consequences have been challenged by the advent of the digital world
  • §09.00.07.00 — Is there order in the state?

10 — What states need

10.00 — §10.00.00

  • §10.00.00.00 — What states need
  • §10.00.01.00 — What do states need?
  • §10.00.02.00 — States need their citizens to continue living, communicating and creating on their platform
  • §10.00.03.00 — A condition for the (continued) existence of states
  • §10.00.04.00 — If and how states facilitate their citizens' augmentation of information processing is irrelevant
  • §10.00.05.00 — States and individuals’ (their citizens’) interests are aligned, not conflicting
  • §10.00.06.00 — A state does not reside in the hearts and minds of a certain group of individuals
  • §10.00.07.00 — States need all of their citizens to augment their information processing

11 — The nature of the state

11.00 — §11.00.00

12 — The government

12.00 — §12.00.00

12.01 — The political system

13 — State justification

13.00 — §13.00.00

14 — State legitimacy

14.00 — §14.00.00

15 — State succession

15.00 — §15.00.00

16 — Sovereignty

16.00 — §16.00.00

17 — Territory and borders

17.00 — §17.00.00

18 — Nation

18.00 — §18.00.00

19 — Archipelago; where do the information platforms that are states live? The EU

19.00 — §19.00.00

20 — Law

20.00 — §20.00.00

21 — Rights

21.00 — §21.00.00

22 — Human rights

22.00 — §22.00.00

23 — Morality

23.00 — §23.00.00

24 — Property

24.00 — §24.00.00

24.01 — Intellectual property

25 — Freedom and liberty

25.00 — §25.00.00

26 — Liberalism

26.00 — §26.00.00

  • §26.00.00.00 — Liberalism
  • §26.00.01.00 — The individualisation of humans and the limits of this philosophy
  • §26.00.02.00 — The borders of this political philosophy of information
  • §26.00.03.00 — Individualistic political theories
  • §26.00.04.00 — The distinction between the public and the private spheres
  • §26.00.05.00 — The inherent conundrum that individualistic theories have to deal with
  • §26.00.06.00 — Why liberalism has had to come up with a number of ideas to limit government
  • §26.00.07.00 — Why the middle political ground has a harder time than the extremes
  • §26.00.08.00 — The most serious problem caused by individualistic theories is that they pit the individual against the state, causing state malaise
  • §26.00.09.00 — The digital world and the right to informational self-determination
  • §26.00.10.00 — The distinction between an individual’s private and public spheres has already been projected onto the digital world
  • §26.00.11.00 — If the two basic premises underpinning much of modern human life are fundamentally flawed, what could replace them?